Lower doses better for shadow work say Jungian therapists

Medical

‘Psycholytic’ techniques with more practicioner involement are making a comeback – and suit lighter trips, claim experts

‘The Psychedelic Eye’ by John Lennon (for it is he) at Kingham lodge sculpture park

Challenging shadow work is best attempted on lower doses of psychedelics with therapist guidance, say Jungian experts – in contrast to current wisdom.

Dr Scott Hill’s Confrontation with the Unconscious is considered the definitive text for using  Jungian psychology in psychedelic therapy and integration. 

Speaking in Vital’s Jungian shadow therapy lecture series, Dr Hill questioned the modern-day orthodoxy for high dose sessions: “Low doses allow us to be more conscious in the experience,” he says.

While recreational MDMA users will tell you “less is more,” the modern-day psychedelic therapy circuit believes in high doses, with ‘non directional’ interaction between therapist and patient.

But “People who keep coming back for high doses may struggle during integration,” Dr Hill continues, “Their experiences are so big – the ‘godhead experience’ – that they struggle to integrate into mainstream reality, and keep wanting to go back.”

Dr Hill says mild doses can still trigger archetypal awareness for example. And he believes experienced users can access and navigate meaningful psychedelic states with lower doses.

“High doses might avoid dealing with the shadow. Maybe that’s why they can disappoint”

Just like many Peruvian shamans believe one becomes more alert to ayahuasca as use increases. (And claiming you’re ‘sensitive to the medicine’ has become a Western humblebrag).

NY-based clinical psychologist Dr Gita Vaid believes intra-muscular ketamine injections can be artfully choreographed to create a specific experience for the patient. 

“High doses might actually be an attempt to avoid dealing with the shadow work. This is why psychedelic experiences can sometimes initially feel disappointing,” she says, “But it’s through the integration process where diamonds of insights can be mined and used for growth.”

Could a skilled therapist lead the complex shadow integration that will truly satisfy patient need?

“What is holding space? Is it just making sure someone's safe or is there a process going on?”

Dr Vaid proposes a re-examination of the ‘psycholytic’ therapy style featuring more interaction between your inner healer, and the outer healer sat alongside.  

“There’s a lot of platitudes in the psychedelic space – I don't even know what we're talking about anymore. What is holding space? Or what's in that umbrella? Is it just making sure someone's safe? Or is there a process going on? And how does one define that?” 

Are we just lame duck ‘shamans’ sitting there not even pretending to commune with supernatural intelligences?

“Frameworks will start emerging to evolve and grow the field of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy”

What divides the psychedelic guide from the friendly barman or hairdresser, says Dr Vaid?

“What constitutes the ‘psychotherapy’ part of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy? We don't really have the systems, the language, vocabulary or theoretical frameworks,” she says, “which I'm hoping will start emerging to actually distinguish, differentiate and get more sophisticated – evolve and grow the field.” 

Dr Vaid admits a lack of ambition isn’t limited to the psychedelic sector: “You even hear psychiatrists talking about sleep and exercise, which to me wouldn't constitute psychotherapy in the first place.”

More Medical articles here on New Psychonaut:

More mushroom tea, vicar?

Approach

Savvy brits in the space are sussed to self-care. But the vulnerable are left behind

Contemporary graffiti in east London

Here’s a ray of optimism, before I start even attempting to unravel the respective messes that are Britain’s drug laws and mental health provision.

A judge in Cumbria, northern England just said she hoped ’the law will catch up with science’ when pardoning an accused man for growing his own magic mushrooms to benefit his mental health.

Britain has the highest depression rate among children in Europe, along with one-third of the continent’s drug overdose deaths and its worst alcohol problem. Mental health problems cost the British economy £118 billion annually. The situation is apparently more dismal than we even think. Lockdown saw a 47% increase in young people seeking help and I need hardly quote again my recent article elsewhere detailing the stigma that still exists in the workplace around stress and burnout.

It’s characteristic of the British legislature to turn a benign blind eye to self-medication while dragging its feet on psilocybin prescriptions. Former prime minister (PM) Boris Johnson and his pantomime villain advisor Dominic Cummings supposedly had psychedelic therapy as a political cause celébre partly because Brexit meant chances to the law could be actioned quicker. Now they’re out of the game, things are even worse in the corridors of power.

Unlikely Men in Tights of this particular pantomime are the Conservative Drug Policy Reform Group

UK home secretary Priti Patel says she’ll ban ‘middle class’ cannabis smokers from nightclubs and take away their passports to derision from even Daily Mail readers. Front runner for new PM Liz Truss has turned Judas on her 420-friendly past.

The centre left is no better with its leader Keir Starmer, a former head of public prosecutions, saying he’s “seen too much damage” in his former role. Dude, the unremittingly grim extraction economy lifestyle is the problem across all classes especially the estate-condemned non-working class. Not the weed itself.

While kids opting for dank oblivion above all else is a problem, it is hardly caused by marijuana alone and previous alternatives like booze and heroin are frankly worse. My entirely subjective opinion from the ground is that the approach reeks of not upsetting near-senile, control-freak baby-boomers.

Unlikely Men in Tights of this particular pantomime are the Conservative Drug Policy Reform Group that are actually part of the UK’s centre-right Conservative [Tory] Party. Its campaign to legalise cannabis and psychedelic therapies has the blessing of former prime minister John Major, ex-Tory leader William Hague, current Northamptonshire police, fire and crime commissioner Stephen Mold, plus ex-MI5 (it’s like Homeland Security) chiefs Lord Evans and Baroness Eliza Manningham-Butler.

Over half of voters from even right-wing parties believe in the legalisation of psychedelic therapy, according to a YouGov poll quoted by broadcaster and former advisor to PM Theresa May Tom Swarbrick. Thought leaders like the redoubtable Zoe Cormier of good eggs Guerrilla Science are also in the media front lines doing the mushroom god’s work.

Meanwhile the country’s largest NHS trust are opening a new dedicated facility in the grounds of the former ‘Bedlam’ hospital alongside Compass Pathways which you can read about elsewhere in this issue.

The naturally British reaction is to quietly do what it seems the justice system, NHS and general public are already doing. Which is plough on regardless leaving the government apparatus and armchair windbags to their own ineffectual posturing. 

More healthy, less normal

Medical

The performance enhancing and problem solving powers of psychedelics are growing in legitimacy and acceptance

By Sidone Roddam via Gallery 46

Psychedelic philosophy endorses mind-expanding supplement use as ethically sound plus highly beneficial to discovery and innovation.

Scientific problem solving with psychedelics is the pet subject of Psychedelic Explorer’s Guide author Dr James Fadiman to this day.

“It would be horrific if psychedelics just turned into anti-depressants,” says Dr Sjöstedt-Hughes, “What a waste of our psychedelic renaissance.”

The ideology begins its case for supplemental LSD use with historical examples, like Nietzsche’s concept of moral relativity. The moustachioed firebrand challenged conservative christian ethics he concluded were toxic to society. Nietzsche believed the church promoted a ‘slave morality’ that he claimed advantaged the unadventurous and the unmotivated – crucially at the expense of the more inspired.

“As with after-work drinks not everyone wants to take part”

Admittedly Nietzsche could come across as a little problematic. So the argument in favour of psychedelic use for self-improvement also deploys topical markers of acceptability.

“Carey Mullins said he ‘learned to use his visual problem solving imagination’ and that led to the applications of DNA,” is one of Psychedelic Philosophy author Dr Chris Letheby’s favourite pieces of lecture ammo. 

Mullins’ open declaration of how much impact LSD had on his studies also makes an appearance in the summer ’22 paper in Drug Science, Policy and Law.

“Many scientific insights were partially if not wholly dependent on criminalised activity”

Psychedelics as potential catalysts of scientific creativity and insight by Drs David Luke and Sam Gandy presents a watertight case for creative problem solving under low doses of LSD (40ug to 100ug have been used in limited official trials over the decades) and otherwise. 

The clarion call deploys history, philosophy, scientific thinking and direct quotes from the likes of Einstein: “The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of true art and true science.” The paper covers the importance of dreams and ‘visions’ in personal and scientific breakthroughs, citing declarations from Google creator Larry Page and Dmitri Mendeleev’s periodic table. It lists the inventors who’ve cited their psychedelic use itself: Apple boss Steve Jobs claimed the drugs advised him to focus on product quality over revenue generation, and contemporary physicist Carlo Rovelli claims psychedelics gave him an understanding of the nature of time which inspired his career.

“Many of the insights outlined, including the Nobel Prize-winning discovery of PCR, were partially if not wholly dependent on criminalised activity… the potential of psychedelics as agents to support creative thinking demonstrates the restrictiveness of a ‘health-only’ classification that fails to holistically consider the breadth of risks and benefits of drug use,” it concludes.

Real life, as ever is far ahead of academia and the medical establishment, let alone politics. Data scientists like Ahnjili ZhuParris, who’s provided frameworks for microdose self-tests and speed learning on psychedelics, are at the cusp of both the ‘Quantified Self’ movement – an army of science nerds self-testing for self-improvement – and the subculture’s citizen science element. 

“It would be horrific if psychedelics just turned into anti-depressants”

Ironically it’s exactly the attitude that eager start-up execs are drawn to. And modern-day corporatism is colonising the culture in its inimitable way. An article in the June ’22 issue of financial bible The Economist declared ‘Bosses want to feed psychedelics to their staff. Are they high?’

It turns out tripping in the office could be a case of two steps forward, one step back.

‘As with after-work drinks, not everyone wants to, or can, take part,’ The Economist reminds us more enthusiastic readers, ‘an asset manager at a big family office reports agonising over whether or not to accept an invitation from a firm in her portfolio to an (illegal) Ayahuasca retreat at a villa in California, with a shaman flown in for the occasion.’

A portent perhaps, that even in the psychedelic renaissance we are still fretting about our workplace networking obligations. Perhaps we were naive to assume we’d glide towards a seamless new interconnectedness.

More ancient forces, The Economist warns, are at play: ‘A mind-bending experience can lead workers to question everything—including capitalism and the nature of work.’

Truly we must be mindful when turning on the staff. The New Health Club and Field Trip are among the companies vying to usher in this new age of glad-handling. Which to be fair sounds a lot more compelling than Friday evening in the local Irish pub.

Apparently though, life is not all about work. And neither does our career have a monopoly on problems that require solving.

“I loved and desperately wanted my wife. This was a surprise to everyone including ourselves”

Within the pages of 1967’s The Problem Solving Psychedelic PG Stafford and BH Golightly went to the heart of the matter.

“Marriage may begin with a great deal that favours success and yet there is an appalling rate at which the relationship deteriorates… the ‘advice’ given by LSD is for the most part benevolent. Instead of encouraging disparagement of a mate for shortcomings, as may result from greater intellectual clarity, the drug generally activates emotional tolerance, if not empathy, and highlights hidden or forgotten attractive qualities.”

The writers quote two husbands who underwent LSD therapy in the 60s:

“I am able to talk to my wife more freely and frankly than I ever used to be. I am not so afraid of saying what I really think even if I know she will not agree. Apart from the restoration of intercourse, we really get on much better than before."

“I loved and desperately wanted my wife. This was a surprise to everyone, including ourselves, because as I said we had been through a bad time together. But under LSD it is impossible to fake anything: she was my connection with life.”

Certainly a more worthwhile state of affairs than after-work drinks.